Names.org, you intriguing mystery

The folks at Names.org reached out to me the other day. Was I familiar with the site? No, I was not. But I gave it a try and liked it — with one hesitation.

Positives from the Patrick page:

  • Hearing a British child pronounce my name
  • Finding my name peaked in the United States in 1964
  • “From 1880 to 2015, the Social Security Administration has recorded 670,580 babies born with the first name Patrick in the United States. That’s more than enough people named Patrick to occupy the country of Montenegro….”

Negatives:

  • Here’s my hesitation: The data sourcing is pretty vague, as is the proprietorship of the site at large. It’s possible this site is doing an amazing job with the Social Security Administration’s trove of birth data, but it’s hard to tell for sure.
  • Seeing my name’s years of decline

Other fascinating things about the site, should the data be accurate?

  • The most popular baby names of all-time. Put aside your fancy yearly data. This chart takes all the yearly data since 1879, adds it up and determines who comes out on top. Five million Jameses and Johns! Four million Marys! This is a page where I’d really like more sourcing, though. As much as I love my brother and mother, I’m skeptical about Robert coming in third all-time for men and Patricia third all-time for women. Both benefit from huge middle-of-the-century numbers. Could those be accurate?
  • The fastest yearly rises of all-time. This chart is wild. Could read all day about the people and events who led to these spikes. Douglas Fairbanks is obvious, but who were the others?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *