Cricket in America
Amit and I e-mailed in January about the origins of cricket. We never got anything resolved, but now I'm cleaning up my inbox. This post is useless unless any of you know anything about cricket.
Tuesday, January 27 – Cooper e-mail
what's your super bowl prediction?
Same day – Khandelwal e-mail
i have none. haven't really been following football and i miss the playoffs while i was in india. i did, however, become an expert on cricket.
Same day – Cooper e-mail
is there much cricket at yale? there was a big game going on at penn when i visited rob. the ball kept flying everywhere.
Same day – Khandelwal e-mail
no cricket at yale, but in india it was all over the news since we were kicking the crap out of the aussies.
Wednesday, January 28 – Cooper e-mail
how come cricket caught on in most of the british empire but not here? se asia, australia, africa and all seem to love it, but you could hit most americans with a cricket bat and they still wouldn't pay attention. was it something about the climate or land type here that made it not catch on?
Same day – Khandelwal e-mail
i've wondered this myself. a good starting point would be when cricket was invented. my guess is that it would be in the early 1800's, when we were no longer part of the Empire, and perhaps our disgust with Britain (from war of 1812 perhaps?) kept us from adopting the game, and inventing baseball instead?
Same day – Cooper e-mail
huh — i hadn't thought of it being invented after the revolution.
looks like you're right:
this is good too:
"The relation between cricket and baseball goes back to the 17th Century. The English who migrated to the United States brought along the earliest form of cricket called 'Rounders'. 'Rounders' was played in the cricket mould, with a pair of stumps and two bases. The bowler used to bowl under arm and the Batsman used cricket bats to protect their stumps. However, with the advent of time, more Americans took to the game and it was changed to suit the increasing participation. This is how baseball originated in its earliest form."
the participation aspect is really interesting, especially in connection to the differences in governments and societies. i hadn't thought about it at all. check out this page here, they dive deep into the evolution:
the one thing they say that i don't buy their continuing claim that baseball grew out of cricket — it seems more like they're both children of rounders.
Same day – Khandelwal e-mail
will this become part of your BLOG?
